Machine Learning Reveals Distinct Immunogenic Signatures of Th1 Imprinting in ART-Treated Individuals with HIV Following Repeated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The human immune system is intrinsically variable and remarkably diverse across a population. The immune response to antigens is driven by a complex interplay of time-dependent interdependencies across components of the immune system. After repeated vaccination, the humoral and cellular arms of the immune response display highly heterogeneous dynamics, further complicating the attribution of a phenotypic outcome to specific immune system components. We employ a random forest (RF) approach to classify informative differences in immunogenicity between older people living with HIV (PLWH) on ART and an age-matched control group who received up to five SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations over 104 weeks. RFs identify immunological variables of importance, interpreted as evidence for Th1 imprinting, and suggest novel distinguishing immune features, such as saliva-based antibody screening, as promising diagnostic features towards classifying responses (whereas serum IgG is not). Additionally, we implement supervised and unsupervised Machine Learning methods to produce physiologically accurate synthetic datasets that conform to the statistical distribution of the original immunological data, thus enabling further data-driven hypothesis testing and model validation. Our results highlight the effectiveness of RFs in utilizing informative immune feature interdependencies for classification tasks and suggests broad impacts of ML applications for personalized vaccination strategies among high-risk populations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".