MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408716403 · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2025.3553417

Cost Optimization of FlexEthernet Over Elastic Optical Network Fronthaul Design

2025· article· en· W4408716403 on OpenAlexafffund
Dahina Koulougli, Kim Khoa Nguyen, Mohamed Cheriet

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer sciencePassive optical networkComputer networkOptical Transport NetworkIntegrated opticsWavelength-division multiplexingElectronic engineeringEngineeringOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Without network slicing supports, traditional Fronthaul architectures struggle to meet the demanding requirements of 5G networks, such as the ultra-low latency and high bit rate specified by the enhanced common public radio interface (eCPRI). In this paper, we design a novel Fronthaul architecture that leverages FlexEthernet (FlexE) over elastic optical network (EON) to enable Fronthaul slicing meeting 5G Fronthaul requirements. Our Fronthaul design is optimized by an integer linear programming (ILP) model, named eFFP, that minimizes the total cost of ownership (TCO). While eFFP meets the strict Fronthaul requirements by provisioning network resources based on worst-case traffic load, it tends to overestimate required bit rate as a result of the inherent uncertainty and variability in real-world traffic. To tackle this challenge, we introduce uFFP, a stochastic Fronthaul provisioning strategy tailored to accommodate uncertain traffic demands and mitigate expenditure wastage. Relying on historical data, uFFP assesses statistical characteristics of traffic patterns to better estimate Fronthaul bit rate. Subsequently, we employ chance-constrained optimization to reformulate the uFFP problem, which is approximately solved using a convex relaxation approach known as uFFPA, and optimally solved using a deep reinforcement learning (DRL) approach called uFFPL. Simulation results demonstrate that our proposed solutions achieve significant cost savings, reducing TCO by 39.79% compared to the baseline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.596
Threshold uncertainty score0.890

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Network and Service ManagementSame topicAdvanced Fiber Optic SensorsFrench-language works237,207