MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Coil Geometry Effects on the Efficiency of Wireless Power Transfer for Brain Implants

2023· article· en· W4408716964 on OpenAlexaff
M. Heshmatzadeh, Abbas Ali Lotfi-Neyestanak, Sima Noghanian

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Power Transfer Systems
Canadian institutionsBritish Columbia Institute of Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWireless power transferElectromagnetic coilWirelessElectrical engineeringPower (physics)Materials scienceComputer sciencePhysicsEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper a voxel brain model consisting of four different tissues is used to study the wireless power transfer for brain implants utilizing the inductive method. ANSYS Maxwell/Simplorer have been used for the simulation of the system. Coils with different geometries were designed, optimized, and then compared in terms of their power transfer efficiency. The effect of changing the position of the implanted coil, thus changing the distance between the coils on the coupling coefficient and power transfer efficiency was studied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.151
Threshold uncertainty score0.553

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Power Transfer SystemsFrench-language works237,207