MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408720066 · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.124.048336

Novel Network Analysis of County- and Individual-Level Factors Associated With Functional Outcomes After Stroke

2025· article· en· W4408720066 on OpenAlexaff
Andrea A. Jones, Lily Zhou, Nichol Castro, Anita Palepu, William J. Panenka, Alexander R. Rutherford, William G. Honer, Eric E. Smith, Thalia S. Field

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgarySimon Fraser UniversityBC Mental Health & Substance Use ServicesUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineModified Rankin ScaleStroke (engine)Social determinants of healthSocial network (sociolinguistics)CentralityCohortClosenessPopulationDemographyGerontologySocial deprivationPublic healthIschemic strokeInternal medicineEnvironmental healthPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Social determinants are known to impact stroke risk and poststroke outcomes. Using complexity science, we examined interrelations between county- and individual-level social and clinical determinants influencing stroke functional outcomes. METHODS: We examined a retrospective cohort of 2 961 664 patients diagnosed with acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke from 2218 US hospitals participating in the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Registry from 2013 to 2019, linked by ZIP code with the county-level institute for health metrics and evaluation data. We constructed multilayer networks, estimating mixed graphical models of 32 nodes representing social and clinical factors. Networks included 4 layers of factors: (1) county-level social, (2) individual-level social, (3) clinical comorbidities, and (4) hospital encounters. Networks were estimated for patients with less favorable (modified Rankin Scale score 3–6) versus favorable (modified Rankin Scale score 0–2) outcomes. We compared network structure and node centrality measures between groups using bootstrap permutation analyses, identifying influential (hub) nodes. RESULTS: The overall influence of social determinants (global connectivity) was greater in patients with less favorable outcomes ( P <0.001). Homelessness and Black race were hub nodes, indicating their role in mediating relationships between social and downstream clinical factors in patients with less favorable outcomes. Being uninsured had greater influence (closeness centrality; P <0.001) in patients with less favorable outcomes, indicating its role in amplifying the effects of social determinants. Greater county-level high school completion ( P <0.001) and a lower proportion of the population living below the US poverty line ( P =0.030) were directly associated with faster onset-to-arrival time in patients with less favorable functional outcomes. The clinical-social determinant network explained 34% of the variance of modified Rankin Scale scores. CONCLUSIONS: Social determinants have a substantial influence on functional outcomes after stroke. County-level poverty directly affected onset-to-arrival time and quality of care. Health insurance status and homelessness were influential and modifiable patient-level factors that may serve as critical leverage points for future interventions aimed at improving outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→