MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408721280 · doi:10.1117/12.3040917

Towards on-chip integration of a silicon photonic microfluidic thermal flow rate sensor on a silicon-on-insulator process

2025· article· en· W4408721280 on OpenAlexaff
Kithmin Wickremasinghe, Samantha M. Grist, Mohammed Al-Qadasi, Sheri Jahan Chowdhury, Ben Cohen‐Kleinstein, Stephen Kioussis, Karen C. Cheung, Lukas Chrostowski, Sudip Shekhar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSilicon on insulatorSiliconMaterials scienceMicrofluidicsSilicon photonicsOptoelectronicsSilicon chipPhotonicsChipThermalProcess (computing)Hybrid silicon laserFlow sensorNanotechnologyElectronic engineeringComputer scienceElectrical engineeringEngineeringAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Silicon photonic (SiP) biosensors promise portable and analytical systems at the point-of-care. An on-chip inchannel flow sensing solution could improve the robustness and accuracy of SiP biosensor-based measurements. This work presents an on-chip silicon photonic microfluidic thermal flow-rate sensor on a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) process to non-intrusively measure the flow rate inside a microfluidic channel. The proposed design is compact, inexpensive, translatable to any photonic foundry process, convenient for integration and readout, and comparable in performance to commercial off-chip calorimetric flow rate sensors. It highlights the potential for miniaturization and on-chip integration of accurate flow rate sensing elements and enabling precision flow control in point-of-care devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotonic and Optical Devices→French-language works237,207→