MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408725646 · doi:10.1117/12.3043874

Development of a photoplethysmography testing platform using stereolithography 3D printing to create human finger optical phantoms with vascular channels for wearable device applications

2025· article· en· W4408725646 on OpenAlexaff
Megh Rathod, Heather J. Ross, Daniel Franklin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkTed Rogers Centre for Heart ResearchUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotoplethysmogramStereolithographyWearable computerComputer science3d printed3D printingBiomedical engineeringComputer hardwareEmbedded systemEngineeringTelecommunicationsWirelessMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photoplethysmography (PPG) is a widely used, non-invasive optical technique but is affected by various confounding factors in human skin, such as patient pigmentation, sensor geometries, and blood composition. There is a need for adaptable testing platforms to better understand how these confounders impact optical sensors. This study aims to develop a low-cost, reproducible platform for rapid assessment of PPG devices. An anatomical finger model was created using SolidWorks, with U-shaped digital palmar arteries designed and printed in photopolymer resin through stereolithography. Pulsations simulating blood flow were generated using a peristaltic pump and a blood analog solution. Several vessel diameters were tested to simulate human vasculature, with successful reproducibility observed for diameters greater than 2.8mm. Pulsatile signals were captured using multi-wavelength PPG, spanning from blue to infrared light. The system is highly customizable, with interchangeable components that offer flexibility to be adjusted and can ameliorate the burden of testing on patients and animals. Future work will integrate an epidermal layer containing melanin to more accurately model skin interactions. This platform is timely, given the ongoing investigation by regulatory bodies into pulse oximeter testing and its role in equitable device development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207