Structural determinants of signal speed: Estimated axonal latency and its multimodal validation during face processing in autism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract It has not previously been possible to investigate the fundamental relationship between axonal structure – which dictates action potential transmission – and human neuronal function in vivo . Here, we introduce a novel metric of axonal signal speed, estimated axonal latency (EAL), derived from the relationship between axonal diameter, myelination, and length measured via MRI. We validate EAL along two pathways of the face processing network by relating it to N170 latency, an electrophysiological marker of face processing speed measured via EEG. Our results show that EAL along these pathways predicts N170 latency specifically during face processing. Moreover, we demonstrate that individuals with and without autism rely upon different pathways, potentially providing a structural account for autism-related face processing differences. By establishing this relationship between EEG-based electrical function and MRI-based axonal microstructure, we provide a non-invasive, spatially detailed estimate of neuronal processing speed that can inform our understanding of brain function, development, and disorder. Teaser Estimated axonal latency is a non-invasive, spatially detailed measure of neuronal speed to inform brain function and disorder.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".