MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ecologically Unequal Exchange as a Catalyst for Climate Action

2025· book-chapter· en· W4408729439 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew K. Jorgenson, Jennifer E. Givens, Xiaorui Huang, Hassan El Tinay

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford University Press eBooks · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEnvironmental Justice and Health Disparities
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAction (physics)Environmental scienceGeographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This chapter summarizes the theory of ecologically unequal exchange (EUE) and discusses its relevance for climate action. First, it summarizes the theory of EUE and describes its origins. Then it briefly discusses the importance of a global approach and details how research that utilizes EUE theory examines the production and unequal distribution of various environmental harms relevant for the climate crisis and human well-being. Next, it highlights research on the forces counteracting the harms and injustices of EUE and then explicitly connects EUE to climate justice and action. The chapter concludes by briefly applying Almeida et al.’s (2024) scheme of climate action, noting how forms of institutional and noninstitutional action may effectively challenge and restrict the climate-related impacts of EUE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score0.935

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford University Press eBooksSame topicEnvironmental Justice and Health DisparitiesFrench-language works237,207