On the use of a Transformer Neural Network to deconvolve ultrasonic signals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pulse-echo ultrasonic techniques play a crucial role in assessing wall thickness deterioration in safety-critical industries. Current approaches face limitations with low signal-to-noise ratios, weak echoes, or vague echo patterns typical of heavily corroded profiles. This study proposes a novel combination of Convolution Neural Networks (CNN) and Transformer Neural Networks (TNN) to improve thickness gauging accuracy for complex geometries and echo patterns. Recognizing the strength of TNN in language processing and speech recognition, the proposed network comprises three modules: 1. pre-processing CNN, 2. a Transformer model and 3. a post-processing CNN. Two datasets, one being simulation-generated, and the other, experimentally gathered from a corroded carbon steel staircase specimen, support the training and testing processes. Results indicate that the proposed model outperforms other AI architectures and traditional methods, providing a 5.45% improvement over CNN architectures from NDE literature, a 1.81% improvement over ResNet-50, and a 17.5% improvement compared to conventional thresholding techniques in accurately detecting depths with a precision under 0.5 λ . • A novel CNN-TNN architecture for ultrasonic signal deconvolution is presented. • TNN improves wall thickness measurement in heavily corroded profiles. • TNN outperforms CNN by 1.81% and thresholding by 17.5% for depths < 0.5 λ . • TNN is 1.7× and 9.3× more precise than CNN and thresholding on overall MAE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".