MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408742234 · doi:10.1016/j.pce.2025.103909

Projection of precipitation variability over the highlands of Yemen by statistical down-scaling for the period 2026–2100

2025· article· en· W4408742234 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ali H. AL-Falahi, Solomon H. Gebrechorkos, Naeem Saddique, Uwe Spank, Christian Bernhofer

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics and Chemistry of the Earth Parts A/B/C · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTechnische Universität DresdenNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationDeutscher Akademischer AustauschdienstColumbia University
KeywordsPeriod (music)ScalingPrecipitationClimatologyProjection (relational algebra)Environmental scienceGeologyGeographyMeteorologyMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate change significantly affects the management of environmental resources, particularly through changes in the amount and variability of local climate variables, such as precipitation. However, current projections from Global Climate Models (GCMs) are not directly applicable to local-scale impact modeling due to their coarse spatial resolution and inherent biases. To address this challenge, the Statistical Down-Scaling Model (SDSM) is employed to downscale daily precipitation, a crucial input for impact assessment models. This study focuses on the highlands of Yemen, a region highly vulnerable to climate change and precipitation variability. Due to limited and incomplete local climate data, we utilized the best available precipitation datasets, including the Climate Hazards Group Infra-Red Precipitation with Station data (CHIRPS), to fill in missing station data. Historical and future predictors derived from the National Center for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) reanalysis and the Canadian Earth System Model Phase 2 (CanESM2) were used to generate future precipitation scenarios, which were compared with the ensemble means from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) and the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). We also used the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) scenarios, specifically SSP126 and SSP585, to evaluate potential future changes in precipitation. Results indicate a projected increase in seasonal precipitation during the 2030s (2026–2050), 2060s (2051–2075), and 2090s (2076–2100). The western highlands, including Al Mahwit, Rymah, and parts of Sana'a governorate, are expected to experience precipitation increases of up to 55 %. Under RCP2.6, the short rainy season (March–May) is projected to increase up to 14 %, while under RCP8.5, this increase could reach 24 %. The long rainy season (June–August) is expected to increase by 6 % under RCP2.6 and 27 % under RCP8.5. The dry season (December–February) could see increases of 18 % under RCP2.6 and 46 % under RCP8.5, while the autumn season (September–November) may experience a substantial rise of 61 %–101 %. At the annual timescale, precipitation is projected to increase up to 34 % higher than the baseline period (1991–2020) across the region. These projections indicate that the highlands of Yemen will experience wetter conditions in the 21st century. The findings provide valuable insights for developing adaptation strategies for water and environmental resource management, considering the potential future impacts of climate change in the region. • Projection of future precipitation trends in the highlands of Yemen using the Statistical Downscaling Model (SDSM) for the period 2026–2100. • Significant seasonal and annual increases in precipitation projected under both RCP2.6 and RCP8.5 climate scenarios. • The highest projected precipitation increases, mainly in autumn, occur in the western highlands of Yemen. • Results provide critical insights for water resource management and climate adaptation strategies in a region highly vulnerable to climate change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.263
Threshold uncertainty score0.140

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics and Chemistry of the Earth Parts A/B/CSame topicClimate variability and modelsFrench-language works237,207