Building Scalable Silicon Microring Resonator‐Based Neuromorphic Photonic Circuits Using Post‐Fabrication Processing with Photochromic Material
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Neuromorphic photonics has become one of the research forefronts in photonics, with its benefits in low‐latency signal processing and potential in significant energy consumption reduction when compared with digital electronics. With artificial intelligence (AI) computing accelerators in high demand, one of the high‐impact research goals is to build scalable neuromorphic photonic integrated circuits which can accelerate the computing of AI models at high energy efficiency. A complete neuromorphic photonic computing system comprises seven stacks: materials, devices, circuits, microarchitecture, system architecture, algorithms, and applications. Here, we consider microring resonator (MRR)‐based network designs toward building scalable silicon integrated photonic neural networks (PNN), and variations of MRR resonance wavelength from the fabrication process and their impact on PNN scalability. Further, post‐fabrication processing using organic photochromic layers over the silicon platform is shown to be effective for trimming MRR resonance wavelength variation, which can significantly reduce energy consumption from the MRR‐based PNN configuration. Post‐fabrication processing with photochromic materials to compensate for the variation in MRR fabrication will allow a scalable silicon system on a chip without sacrificing today's performance metrics, which will be critical for the commercial viability and volume production of large‐scale silicon photonic circuits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".