Digital twin applications in supply chain management: A systematic literature review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The new economic context has brought new challenges to the supply chain and has increased the complexity of its processes. The digitalization; as one of these challenges, is a rapidly evolving paradigm that transforms supply chains by integrating data and communication technologies to optimize operations, enhance sustainability, and improve overall performance. Digital twin technology emerged as one of the most promising digital tools that offer an innovative approach to supply chain management. However, the adoption of digital twins in the supply chain is still in its early stages. Previous research papers presented limited overviews of the applications of digital twin technology in supply chain systems that need to be extended, as it is inevitably a work in progress. In this matter, we conducted a systematic literature review built upon 31 articles to determine the applications of supply chain digital twins (SCDT). This study is divided into three core themes; the first is a comprehensive review of the paradigm of digital supply chain with a focus on digital twin technology and its primary features. The second theme presents an analysis of the 31 papers where we explore the different purposes of SCDTs and their integration. in the third theme by using VOSviewer to conduct a network analysis. We aim; through this paper, to contribute significantly to the supply chain management field by summarizing and analyzing existing research and developments in the applications of digital twins in the different areas of supply chains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.051 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.025 | 0.028 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".