Outstanding figure of Ukrainian medicine: touches to the portrait of Feofil Yanovsky (to the 165th anniversary of his birth)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT. The article describes the life path of the famous Kyiv physician Feofil Yanovsky. It tells about his origin, parents, and upbringing circumstances. The circumstances that prompted him to dedicate his life to medicine are revealed. Special attention is paid to the teachers of the medical faculty of St. Volodymyr Kyiv University, why formed the knowledge base and worldview of the scientist. The internship of Feofil Yanovsky in the best institutes and clinics of France and Germany is described. It tells about the establishment of bacteriological laboratories by Feofil Yanovsky in Kyiv. The main milestones of his medical journey are outlined. Brief information on the essence of the researcher’s main scientific work is given. The achievements of Feofil Yanovsky as a humanist and innovator who was ahead of his time are described. Selflessness is described as a personal quality of the doctor. Particular attention is paid to the respectful attitude towards Feofil Yanovsky of ordinary residents of Kyiv, his popularity among the townspeople.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".