MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408755102 · doi:10.1101/2025.03.22.25324456

Understanding Diabetes and Obesity in The Bahamas Through International Comparison of Health, Economic, and Policy Indicators

2025· preprint· en· W4408755102 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cesar Barrabi, Ömur Cinar Elci

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCross-sectional studySocioeconomic statusInequalityHealth careDiabetes mellitusGeographyDemographic economicsMedicineEnvironmental healthEconomicsEconomic growthMathematicsPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Diabetes mellitus is a global issue affecting over 828 million people in 2021. Risk factors for developing diabetes include poor diet, sedentary lifestyle, and genetic predispositions; however, growing evidence suggests significant influence from socioeconomic determinants. The Non-Latin Caribbean continues to be an underrepresented population in diabetes research, particularly The Bahamas. In this paper, we investigate the current state of diabetes in The Bahamas and examine the socioeconomic determinants associated with poor health outcomes. Research Design and Methods Publicly available data were compiled from the World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization, International Diabetes Federation, PAHO Enlace, World Bank, and regional reports, prioritizing estimates from 2019 to 2022. With a focus on The Bahamas, we collected data from 10 non-Latin Caribbean nations, as well as the United States, Canada, France, and Germany, to compare health and socioeconomic indicators and assess the current state of the Bahamas. Key metrics of interest included the prevalence of diabetes and obesity, diabetes-related mortality, and indicators of socioeconomic conditions. Results Diabetes prevalence in The Bahamas was 8.8% in 2021, lower than the United States at 10.7% but well below the highest rate of 16.1% observed in Saint Kitts and Nevis. The proportion of diabetes-related deaths under age 60 in The Bahamas was 6.2%, nearly double the rate in the United States (3.5%) and the third highest in the region, following Belize at 10.6% and Saint Kitts and Nevis at 9.9%. To examine long-term trends, we compared obesity rates across The Bahamas, the United States, France, and Germany. Bahamian women consistently had the highest rates, with 55.06% of those over 18 having a BMI over 30. Additionally, The Bahamas showed higher levels of socioeconomic vulnerabilities across several domains as well as insufficient policy progress compared to North America. Conclusions Diabetes in The Bahamas remains a serious public health concern, marked by high premature mortality and rising obesity rates that exceed those of several high-income countries. Strengthening national surveillance and addressing socioeconomic disparities will be critical for reversing current trends and supporting effective public health responses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.257

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology→French-language works237,207→