Bayesian inference for the Markov-modulated Poisson process with an outcome process
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In medical research, understanding changes in outcome measurements is crucial for inferring shifts in health conditions. However, traditional methods often struggle with large, irregularly longitudinal data and fail to account for the tendency of individuals in poorer health to interact more frequently with the healthcare system. Additionally, clinical data can lack information on terminating events like death. To address these challenges, we start from the continuous-time hidden Markov model which models observed data as outcomes influenced by latent health states. Our extension incorporates a point process to account for the impact of health states on observation timings and includes a ‘death’ state to model unobserved terminating events through a Poisson process, where transition rates depend on the latent health state. This approach captures both the severity of the disease and the timing of healthcare interactions. We present an exact Gibbs sampler procedure that alternates between sampling the latent health state paths and the model parameters. By including the ‘death’ state, we mitigate biases in parameter estimation that would arise from solely modelling ‘live’ health states. Simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed Gibbs sampler performs effectively. We apply our method to Canadian healthcare data, offering valuable insights for healthcare management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".