MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408755520 · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf425

Strengthening the link between fullerenes and a subset of diffuse interstellar bands

2025· article· en· W4408755520 on OpenAlexaff
D. Majaess, Tina A. Harriott, Halis Seuret, Cercis Morera‐Boado, Lou Massa, Chérif F. Matta

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicFullerene Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's UniversityUniversité LavalDalhousie UniversityMount Saint Vincent University
FundersNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsPhysicsFullereneAstrophysicsLink (geometry)Interstellar mediumAstrobiologyAstronomyGalaxyQuantum mechanicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT A debate persists regarding the correlation between the diffuse interstellar bands (DIBs) 9577 and 9632 Å, and whether they share a common molecular carrier (i.e. C$_{60}^{+}$). A robust high correlation determination emerges after bridging the baseline across an order of magnitude ($\simeq 50 - 700$ mÅ, $r=0.93\pm 0.02$), and nearly doubling the important higher equivalent width domain by adding new Mg ii-corrected sightlines. Moreover, additional evidence is presented of possible DIB linkages to fullerenes, whereby attention is drawn to DIBs at 7470.38, 7558.44, and 7581.47 Å, which match the Campbell experimental results for C$_{70}^{+}$ within 1 Å, and the same is true of 6926.48 and 7030.26 Å for C$_{70}^{2+}$. Yet their current correlation uncertainties are unsatisfactory and exacerbated by expectedly low equivalent widths (e.g. $\overline{EW}=4$ mÅ for 6926.48 Å), and thus further observations are required to assess whether they represent a bona fide connection or numerical coincidence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.675
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicFullerene Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207