Establishing a Contribution: Calibration, Contextualization, Construction and Creation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Riikka Sarala, Shuang Ren and Paul Hibbert When we commissioned this editorial symposium we had two principal aims. The first was to provide guidance for authors who are new to the journal and those with more experience who are seeking to develop impactful contributions to our field. The second aim was to showcase the experience and insights of the team of associate editors at the British Journal of Management (BJM): all of the team are pivotal in the journal's mission and work hard to help authors make the most of their research. With our twin aims in mind, we gave the team a broad remit. They were free to approach the task of offering guidance from their own standpoint and with their own choice of focus within BJM’s field. We also encouraged our colleagues to work in the way that they found most productive: independently, with other BJM associate editors or with colleagues from within their own networks. While other commitments and the heavy burdens of academic life meant that some of our colleagues could not participate in this symposium (but will hopefully be able to take part in further editorials), eight of the team took part, along with some collaborators. They covered a wide range of themes from BJM’s broad and inclusive take on the field of business, management and organization studies: a perspective on upper echelon decision-making and digital transformation (Arndt, Chang and Aharonson); a balanced view of artificial intelligence (Chowdhury and Budhwar); a standard-setting survey of trends in organizational behaviour (Costa and Daniels); a generative ‘take’ on religion in the workplace (Cullen); emerging directions in research on fintech and digital finance (Momtaz and Vismara); opportunities for new research in the management, knowledge and education space (Rigg); and a wayfinding view of equality, diversity and inclusivity research and practice (Śliwa). If you are developing your research in any of those areas, you will find the advice invaluable. Taken as a whole, our colleagues' work proved to be diverse, instructive and generative. Reflecting on their contributions and themes allowed us to construct the framework for guidance shown in Figure 1. As you can see in the figure, the contributions from our editorial team members helped to show that there are two key aspects of the journal's terrain: the foundations, a set of principles and standards that show how to construct rigorous research in the field; and the frontiers, the emerging debates that allow the field to be extended – or for unmapped territory to be charted. The contributions also showed that there are two ways of engaging with these aspects of the terrain: through exemplifying, which roots guidance in key principles and particular exemplars in the journal's recent articles to show standards; and through exploring, which finds new opportunities through uncovering and characterizing a latent theme in the journal or making helpfully speculative projections from established debates. While we have mapped out the contributions from our colleagues in this way, it is important to note that you will find that each contribution covers much more than one of these areas – our aim is simply to highlight how authors might usefully focus their attention on each. Submissions that meet all of these criteria are likely to make the strongest kinds of contribution. That is, they are likely to leave readers surprised – but convinced. To reflect on and understand all of these criteria in depth, along with focal advice for your area of disciplinary specialization, we encourage you to read our colleagues’ helpful contributions below. We hope that you find them as insightful, useful and instructive as we did: the individual contributions follow below, in the order presented in Figure 1. Ana Cristina Costa and Kevin Daniels The purpose of this editorial is to outline the recent trends in micro-organizational behaviour (micro-OB) in BJM for 2023–2024. As a core discipline in management studies, micro-OB focuses particularly on how individual and group behaviour in organizations evolves and adapts, while shaped by work norms and multilevel relationships and dynamics, governance and technological structures. Within this broad remit, micro-OB draws heavily upon work and organizational psychology, although not exclusively so. With the globalization of the economy and the aftermath of the recent pandemic, the very nature of working relationships has been transformed. The articles in this editorial provide insights into how research reflects some of these broader challenges and areas where future articles in BJM could make contributions. We focus on two broad areas that reflect the majority of micro-OB studies published in BJM recently. In total, we analyse 10 articles clustered around two major areas: individual behaviour and leadership. Of six articles focused on individual employee behaviour, four focused on performance-enhancing aspects of employee behaviour, of which two focused on proactive behaviour, namely Ren, Tang and Zhang (2023) and Otterbring Ren employee behaviour and found that employee behaviour was with employee but the was on and by organizational found that employee in was to work through (2023) also focused on and found that employee was with and with how management to organizational for that work behaviour was a In to the four and a knowledge found that was to knowledge through and with the how to their organizational and how organizational to their of Of the four on the theme of the of the in and of that are to the and the focal of the research is While the how two of that is, and show to the research how can provide with and that help articles show the nature of the and the by the of developing and to the of organizational in particular with a in and the of their behaviour in developing The by and (2023) the of in of through from organizational to in as there is focus and this the of in the as into a work organizational behaviour important aspects as in work and In of the contributions to articles – all four articles on – from of or in with is approach in to understand employee behaviour and relationships from the of view of than and the within a framework for also as a perspective two other articles also heavily in articles published in BJM to and and the of to and of organizational a of all 10 articles research are authors to a of and with by from articles also studies, the of in studies on Ren two studies, with and one with studies on field studies and Otterbring is a wide of four and were not and this reflects the of the of the The of and authors that the of the British Journal of Management reflects the journal's and not BJM’s as a for micro-OB research. there is for the of at the that are more likely to out from the make take the of is and these with rigorous major area from our is that of workplace and on workplace in other major journal studies of workplace and a major of research in micro-OB and in other have been two studies published in BJM with and and although were with the and one was focused on organizational In of the of reflects but also the of of the to that are of than are in studies of and – a that other areas of management studies not We BJM to the standards of in each of we note that experience were not in the studies we in other In field studies with the strongest for were also from our most likely reflects the in in organizational The of studies in our is also of the articles in our has the of their behaviour, and relationships are not it articles and the research to that of and by in one are to in from other are studies that have to relationships in and of in and and relationships while for relationships and The of generative artificial intelligence has and debates in management and academic The has been by or in management and While and have their is is a balanced perspective that the and of the and aspects of in research and to a more and on by a research balanced perspective on is for a that the and and to provide insights for and and in and which as or can a of and and of and as and balanced approach a not on can but also on how it can with organizational norms and is particularly in and management where the organizational and and balanced perspective to and and a balanced governance framework a within which and with organizational and a framework is for the of and with the of a balanced research not can to but will also the of new while guidance for To four key themes and their research are presented below, to and future in and themes aim to of that are that research rigorous and impactful in academic and In a balanced perspective will organizations to while and The research of that these themes will and with knowledge and to with organizational norms and will to a more and of into and management the and focus on management knowledge and education is new for is not that there have not been the but with the in of a in the BJM is other as of Management and Management Journal of Management and Journal of Management in the of management education and management to the of management knowledge and BJM’s the for the of Management is not a In the authors that management and education has a for future of organizations in all with the knowledge and for the and and that into and in and are to our out of a in the BJM by and Management as a for In the authors our along with and and the nature of and as a to and management practice as a for and we to to new research for management and to that we have important in the and of our and their organizations is not a recent but it is and more at the there have been of the in management education of broader and and on a of and all of which with the of and as and In a for a management education for a of it to not simply on and but also on as and to and at and for a of and on and of management In the of the and the for research and practice has of recent articles the to themes that help for future research. The first is the is the purpose of management and and In the research might have on to the on from or the on other as the or of can and to be much The second theme to and how particular of can our and the ways we and management and in their and as ways in which can be in and the of in and of management practice within focus on how can a in and by a of the is also within BJM see for important theme for future research to of how or can a in and the of how is the of theme is the of have in the of articles how the and of by to to for in their and see on the of and on of to in the are that further as the or the of as which has most to but where we to much the that and to to the challenges We see of articles published in the as as in that of that for to develop in management and and or to and this in it is to to the and of to and as particular make a to the ways and management in and in to further ways in which management education in the of or where that set out to be themes are of the kinds of we to see in could from further research and a Management or to on any of these themes could also be in a Management of a recent BJM is and that and management research. second is a by as reflect on working the to for a more balanced with and of the We are to see for the new of and we very much hope to see and for Management and British Journal of Management for further on contribution and management research reflects the and challenges that and other of organizations with at a as as the of who the that have been the it is not that a of has been around to equality, diversity and inclusivity in organizational BJM has been a for research. has a for a of and in the first of and that organizations were more diverse, and that this presented with the to new in of of to BJM has published contributions to from a range of articles the the academic and and and and on the and of members of BJM articles have readers with insights into a of aspects of also through and these that in BJM has been the for research on to to make more work is our a to – you very for a as been of the you it all the you can to in the If you to you at as as research and practice have a to that by the to all the work has been in to our of the ways in which and and with to can and be in order for organizations to more inclusive and the the of this has not been to organizational and of members of in the in we have a organizational have also been of a within the academic research. The of research and practice at inclusivity and as and of and – which has in with the in the and – has been to research and and also at this a of is from and from as BJM to make that with organizational inclusivity and is not as found out from the all of us who making organizations more inclusive and to we to with research and we as as we have to the field. In to our research in the of the and other challenges and other organizations in our – and by – it is important to reflect on the directions of these are for four The first of these to research that is in – and knowledge within and – and is by a and a practice We to more in and organizational and of and that further research is that the broader and with to the of inclusivity and in as by and of the of on a and it is for to much more attention to and to have space in as the from and organizational life of in or the in we our research not to and but also to with and for making the future of work more inclusive and and BJM’s authors to how their and research or debates in the note the nature of BJM’s work and management authors can and their work on with the of this important part of our how in the that the of have to new in management and organizational the from of religion of has in the workplace through of management and and and and that to religion and work or as that can be or with of organizational to the of published research on and in the but the to which these research on religion and work is and can a of where religion and they a and view of experience of their or a of how or than a field of of religion and organization the research in the of religion and organizational research. BJM has published in the in of these religion and individual in organizations and and studies and studies and and and it is that the most area in the journal is in the field that as and although this is a in the of have to make a contribution the of in the and their the and that them and the through which they are has the to make important While BJM religion as important of and recent contributions have focused on how of their in or and and a more perspective on the of the they these articles the of and in a way that insights for and In these in the of organizational life as that is and to BJM’s research on religion and work will be by contributions that with the way in which and with how and experience these the of these are to as than for that all the way a or that all the way a a perspective is of the that within and the nature of experience of their and that while there are more than in the it be to that there are or within this in not in other and there is diversity in how and are religion as a it in while that it is at and in very The the of religion in more but it also more management research than that religion or are to be on or a perspective new for our of how work and organizational life are in the can also be at the or where of and into and on and the of other or new and can be at the as with the of the of and or of a research perspective for research on how and or with the organizational and aspects of religion in BJM research has focused on the of at the where individual their own through organizational that or not at The of that experience with and not their but on a and With of a life as can and not that articles on are BJM’s are that can any as as it is of a that is to the or the to BJM’s of experience in organizations that are to the diversity of and that can have and and to developing of as they have particular in the and that the of and which to the of in will be to BJM’s research on management and organizational on religion and in have the of and there are opportunities to understand how other aspects of the and of although the major are in management research in the of members of and new have much which opportunities to new and insights for management and organizational research in Chang and recent in and the management research has been to these and insights that can and the of digital management has to develop a framework of that the of knowledge on in the digital In the we some areas of we for future research particularly to the and The digital new and around digital and experience digital and the to a that technological with While there is of the in digital research on the and that make in a digital research could which are most for in how they can develop these and the of decision-making on intelligence is to organizational through and by them to their work by and and by and a in organizational offering while The and organizational a more of how these within research the contributions of to organizational and these or as and further studies how organizations can with insights and and the that organizational in this these is for organizations seeking to while a focus on and a diverse, and inclusive work In where it is to how and are transformation and new the in with the aspects of as and (Arndt, While can there is research on how it and employee and the of is in the of studies could how the for digital and for to organizational and In a opportunities for to from the are of from or from who new and to or a while major much of the and some research this and is how these particularly in to new research could how dynamics, the by the of and and the for these to in by The digital is from to where and to and and into a for and decision-making and While some research the of digital for and how and with and research could how within digital the and the of in technological particularly in to of research could how can be within these management provide the for our on how organizations their through and to a of the organization and that our way of organizational behaviour and and organizational and in and and and areas as the of and within and to the and the and of the management team be In this (2023) the of and that in the of focus to the of management and than the focus on The digital has been the way and with behaviour and The in in are to those the and from to Management will to and to the new the and that have in the two we have that for future particularly to the and the of can to other for research. The of in technological can the of at the them to the of The in and can also new organizational and and to and find new ways they can to the of in the research can by the and that will be to and and how the upper echelon to the new challenges by developing new and to in a Paul and a of to the of digital to and new in The of fintech is the debates and to new research directions in four key fintech that have attention in the and management finance and and governance artificial intelligence and and and digital transformation of areas themes that are the future of the and further academic and criteria are to fintech and digital are more of the of the of and more they help and and through more and The of fintech into finance is in the of criteria through digital that and and of The of fintech as and how can the and of and the of digital the of and has the of these While digital the of new has also to and in the finance As there is a for a more of the and in the digital transformation of can fintech and digital finance be and in a more as and economy can fintech and into their digital and that the of finance is not by the of technological these research is to and the of intelligence and are and through their in and the and of by or and the in and management, for by on to and offering insights into the to in on the and the The and management has the of in organizational as by the of these within the finance area in of further research. key for future focus on how can and As more to their and are to are the of on and to particularly for or these help or they or are the with the of in and how can and these these research will help in the of on the and that these are and in and As the finance to in this area of important for academic research and a framework for and the for of and a of while and and has how and how to and how in a digital and and the of and has also challenges and around and have to the of in the finance to more and for the of organizational the and of a for and how a will a of to in future in a of governance and and transformation in finance digital to the and of for by the and of fintech into The of digital transformation in finance is and and the most digital transformation debates on organizational in the fintech and that from fintech a the digital transformation of and to research opportunities to the of that is, more with at more to digital and how is this to the future of it is digital transformation through of and As the finance digital some of the most and impactful research opportunities at the of and the of on to finance and the of is for that these are The British Journal of Management is particularly to to these research which have for the future of the is a and the in Management at the of and of research to and organization studies and behaviour, of and and their on a behaviour and is a and the in in the of Management at the of and of research is by the of how in of these how we see and work research on and technological the and of new in and that of work is the focus on and as as as some of the of the is the of and is the of Management Journal and the for research and at the British of is for research in the of and and emerging with a focus on Chang is associate and of the of Management at is also with and the of research focuses on and Chang as associate for the Journal of and Management and is on the editorial of the British Journal of Management and Journal of and is associate of emerging and digital at research artificial intelligence management, and digital transformation and digital and management, in employee and Ana Cristina Costa is a and research at the of of in organizational behaviour and to in and at work and to digital work has been published in as Journal of Journal of Journal of and and Journal of and is a of editorial and as associate of the British Journal of has as associate of the Journal of and research has also had has with organizations as in the on team in the of on space and with and other on the of much and their for employee and through the is a in of is associate of the British Journal of Management and a of the editorial of of Management and and the Journal of Management workplace and and management and organizational Kevin Daniels is a of organizational behaviour at the of is a of the British of and of As as as associate of the British Journal of Kevin has also as of the Journal of and and associate for Journal of and and Paul the of at the of and is a associate of and emerging at the of Management at in from the and in finance from Paul also in from the and in and organization from research and are in the field of and Paul has published in the management and finance is a of management education at Management academic has and research that is to practice and is to to make a in their organizations and is associate of the British Journal of Management and Journal of Management and editorial and associate of is a at the of of research draws on and insights from the broader and and has been published in academic and other is particularly in the ways in which aspects of and work and as as organizational and is a of finance at the of and at research focus on finance and and digital is of and and Journal of and of of and associate of the British Journal of is as a by Riikka is the of at the of at research focuses on the of knowledge and management in and and is a of the British Journal of Management and a of the British of Shuang Ren is a of work and and of and at research is at the of management and and has published on these in as Journal of Journal of Journal of Management Management and Management Journal and has two research is a of the British Journal of Paul Hibbert is of Management at the of and at the of is a of the the Management the British of and the of and from the of in research is on practice within the broader of of and
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".