Does knee joint arthropathy exist post-COVID-19 in the long term? A cross-sectional study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pain and inflammation in the joints of the lower limbs have been reported in people infected with COVID-19. The primary aim of this study was to investigate knee joint arthropathy after COVID-19 for one year or more, and the secondary objective was to assess the level of functional activities after the recovery of COVID.METHODS: Three hundred ninety-nine people who had recovered from COVID-19 for more than one year and were more than 18 years old participated in this cross-sectional study. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) was used online to assess pain, joint stiffness, and physical function. A 5-point Likert Scale and an unpaired t-test were used to measure percentages and differences between domains of the WOMAC.RESULTS: Most of the participants showed a significant increase in knee pain, stiffness, and difficulty with physical function (P<0.001) after recovery from COVID-19, with a total WOMAC score of 96.CONCLUSIONS: After recovery from COVID-19, knee arthropathy is a common symptom in addition to physical function impairment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it