MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408771040 · doi:10.1038/s41437-025-00757-x

Correction: Revealing stable SNPs and genomic prediction insights across environments enhance breeding strategies of productivity, defense, and climate-adaptability traits in white spruce

2025· erratum· en· W4408771040 on OpenAlexaff
Eduardo P. Cappa, Charles Chen, Jennifer G. Klutsch, Jaime Sebastian‐Azcona, Blaise Ratcliffe, Xiaojing Wei, Letitia Da Ros, Yang Liu, Sudarshana Reddy Bhumireddy, Andy Benowicz, Shawn D. Mansfield, Nadir Erbilgin, Barb R. Thomas, Yousry A. El‐Kassaby

Bibliographic record

VenueHeredity · 2025
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest ecology and management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of AlbertaNatural Resources CanadaUniversity of British ColumbiaCanadian Forest Service
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdaptabilityBiologyProductivityWhite (mutation)Evolutionary biologySingle-nucleotide polymorphismComputational biologyGeneticsEcologyGenotypeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article “Revealing stable SNPs and genomic prediction insights across environments enhance breeding strategies of productivity, defense, and climate-adaptability traits in white spruce”, written by Eduardo P. Cappa, Charles Chen, Jennifer G. Klutsch et al., was originally published under exclusive license to “The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Genetics Society”. As a result of the subsequent decision to publish the article under the open access model, the article’s copyright notice was changed on 03 March 2025 to © The Author(s) 2025 and the article is now distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.350
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHereditySame topicForest ecology and managementFrench-language works237,207