MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408771140 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-71594-5_7

Disability, Health, and Welfare Rights

2025· book-chapter· en· W4408771140 on OpenAlexaff
Ziba Vaghri, Roberta Ruggiero, Gerison Lansdown, Adem Arkadas-Thibert, Christian Whalen

Bibliographic record

VenueChildren's well-being · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicChild and Adolescent Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPityHuman rightsTreatyWelfarePolitical scienceSocial WelfareSocial rightsLawLaw and economicsSociologyPsychologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Convention on the Rights of the Child includes a broad range of social and economic rights. This section focuses on the social and economic rights that address health and well-being:Article 23 constitutes the first dedicated provision in a human rights treaty to persons with disabilities, in this case, children, and although included here, its implications go beyond basic health and welfare. Coupled with the explicit recognition of children with disabilities in Article 2 as a group entitled to protection from discrimination, the Convention on the Rights of the Child made an important breakthrough in affirming recognition that children with disabilities are holders of rights, and not, as had been traditional in most societies around the world, objects of pity or passive recipients of care. Article 33 is also an innovative provision, addressing children’s right to be protected from the illicit use of narcotic drugs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.110

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChildren's well-beingSame topicChild and Adolescent HealthFrench-language works237,207