MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408771181 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-71594-5_6

Family Environment and Alternative Care Rights

2025· book-chapter· en· W4408771181 on OpenAlexaff
Ziba Vaghri, Roberta Ruggiero, Gerison Lansdown, Adem Arkadas-Thibert, Christian Whalen

Bibliographic record

VenueChildren's well-being · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEthics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutonomyConventionContext (archaeology)Convention on the Rights of the ChildState (computer science)Political scienceChild rightsLawPsychologyPublic relationsLaw and economicsSociologyHuman rightsComputer scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Convention on the Rights of the Child contains several articles focused on the relationship of the child within the family:Together, these articles provide a comprehensive framework for respecting, protecting, and fulfilling the rights of children in the context of their need for care, whatever their family circumstances. On the one hand, the Convention seeks to affirm the primacy of parents as the main caregivers of their children, and to require the state to meet a range of obligations to support parents in that role. On the other hand, the Convention introduces measures to render the child visible within the context of the family, imposing certain parameters on the autonomy and authority of parents in respect of the nature of direction and guidance they can provide to the child. Additional articles address the measures that are needed to protect the rights of the child when the family is unable to provide appropriate care for a child.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChildren's well-beingSame topicEthics and Legal Issues in Pediatric HealthcareFrench-language works237,207