MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408773496 · doi:10.58931/cct.2025.113

The Importance of Hypertriglyceridemia: Risk of Atherosclerosis and Available Treatments

2025· article· en· W4408773496 on OpenAlexaff
Robert A. Hegele

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Cardiology Today · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipid metabolism and disorders
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypertriglyceridemiaChylomicronVery low-density lipoproteinTriglycerideInternal medicineEndocrinologyLipoprotein lipaseLipoproteinPopulationIntermediate-density lipoproteinCholesterolChemistryBiologyMedicineAdipose tissue

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Serum triglycerides are derived from both exogenous and endogenous sources. Exogenous triglycerides are obtained through the diet and circulate post prandially within large, intestinally-derived chylomicron particles, which are normally cleared within 3 to 4 hours after eating. Endogenous triglycerides are hepatically produced and circulate in smaller very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) particles, which are remodelled in plasma to form even smaller triglyceride-depleted low density lipoprotein (LDL) particles. While the atherogenic impact of LDL and its cholesterol content are well appreciated, the atherogenic role of triglyceride-rich lipoprotein particles, including VLDL and various remnant lipoprotein species, had only recently come into focus. Approximately 25% of the population has mild-to-moderate hypertriglyceridemia, characterized by triglyceride levels ranging from 2 to 9.9 mmol/L, while approximately 1 in 500 has severe hypertriglyceridemia, defined as triglyceride levels >10 mmol/L. Pathogenic DNA variants within the gene encoding the triglyceride clearing enzyme lipoprotein lipase (LPL) or one of its co-factors (APOC2, APOA5, GPIHBP1 or LMF1) can cause severe hypertriglyceridemia, that presents in childhood. Adults with milder forms of genetic predisposition in combination with secondary factors, can also express triglyceride levels this high.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Cardiology TodaySame topicLipid metabolism and disordersFrench-language works237,207