MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408775655 · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093434

Cohort profile: the Genetics of Glucose regulation in Gestation and Growth (Gen3G) – a prospective prebirth cohort of mother–child pairs in Sherbrooke, Canada, 3-year and 5-year follow-up visits

2025· article· en· W4408775655 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Amélie Taschereau, Myriam Doyon, Mélina Arguin, Catherine Allard, Véronique Desgagné, Anne‐Marie Côté, Éric Massé, Pierre‐Étienne Jacques, Patrice Perron, Marie‐France Hivert, Luigi Bouchard

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchDiabète QuébecNational Institutes of HealthUniversité de SherbrookeAmerican Diabetes Association
KeywordsMedicinePregnancyProspective cohort studyOffspringCohortObstetricsCohort studyAnthropometryGestationPediatricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Initiated in 2010, the Genetics of Glucose regulation in Gestation and Growth (Gen3G) prospective cohort investigates the pathophysiology of impaired glycaemic regulation in pregnancy and evaluates its impact on both the mothers and her offspring health trajectory. Follow-up visits 3 and 5 years after delivery aimed to investigate pregnancy-related risk factors such as maternal obesity and gestational hyperglycaemia in relation to the mother's metabolic health after pregnancy, and with offspring health outcomes such as risk of obesity and neurodevelopmental problems in early childhood. We also investigated molecular mechanisms involved in the fetal programming of these later health outcomes. PARTICIPANTS: Of the 1024 women originally recruited in the first trimester of pregnancy, we have targeted the 854 who had complete glucose tolerance test data and the 724 newborns who provided placenta and/or cord blood samples for follow-up recruitment. Of these, 695 mother-child dyads agreed to be contacted for the prospective follow-up visits. 448 and 521 mother-child dyads completed the research visits at 3 and 5 years after delivery respectively. FINDINGS TO DATE: At both visits, we collected the mother's and child's medical history, lifestyle (using validated questionnaires), sociodemographic status, anthropometric measurements, mother's blood samples, child's saliva samples and growth charts. At the 5-year-old visit, we additionally collected the mother's and child's urine and stool samples and the child's blood samples; we performed a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test in the mothers and assessed the body composition in children using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Using the Gen3G rich longitudinal data set, we have enhanced the understanding of the pathophysiology and characterisation of the heterogeneity of gestational diabetes mellitus, and we have shown that gestational hyperglycaemia and insulin resistance are associated with offspring epigenetics (DNA methylation) variations in the placenta, cord blood and blood at 5 years of age, as well as with offspring anthropometric, metabolic and neurodevelopmental outcomes in early childhood. FUTURE PLANS: We are currently conducting a prospective follow-up of mothers and their children 12 years after delivery to study how prenatal and early-life metabolic factors may programme childhood adiposity and obesogenic dietary behaviours. This follow-up should be completed by the end of 2026.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Open→Same topicGestational Diabetes Research and Management→French-language works237,207→