Real-Time Optimal Control Design for Quad-Tilt-Wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quad-tilt-wing (QTW) Unpiloted Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) combine the vertical takeoff and landing capabilities of rotary-wing designs with the high-speed, long-range performance of fixed-wing aircraft, offering significant advantages in both civil and military applications. The unique configuration of QTW UAVs presents complex control challenges due to nonlinear dynamics, strong coupling between translational and rotational motions, and significant variations in aerodynamic characteristics during transitions between flight modes. To address these challenges, this study develops an optimal control framework tailored for real-time operations. A State-Dependent Riccati Equation (SDRE) approach is employed for attitude control, addressing nonlinearities, while a Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) is used for position and velocity control to achieve robustness and optimal performance. By integrating these strategies and utilizing the inverse dynamics approach, the proposed control system ensures stable and efficient operation. This work provides a solution to the optimal control complexities of QTW UAVs, advancing their applicability in demanding and dynamic operational environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".