BlockHybrid: Accelerating Object Detection Pipelines With Hybrid Block-Wise Execution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Latency-sensitive edge video analytics applications require rapid responses for real-time decision-making, driving the demand for efficient object detection pipelines. Conventional pipelines transmit and process full frames, overlooking redundancy in videos and leading to unnecessary resource consumption. Existing block-wise conditional execution methods mitigate this issue by processing only informative blocks. However, they treat all informative blocks equally and fail to further categorize these blocks. To address this limitation, we propose BlockHybrid, an edge video analytics framework designed to accelerate object detection pipelines by hybrid block-wise execution. Specifically, BlockHybrid classifies blocks into hard or easy blocks using a policy network. Hard blocks are transmitted and processed by a block-wise detector on the server, while easy blocks are handled by an efficient tracker locally on the camera, reducing redundant computation and communication. Extensive experiments demonstrate that BlockHybrid can achieve 8.8%–31.5% higher local execution speed and comparable detection accuracy compared to state-of-the-art methods, and accelerate end-to-end processing—including camera-to-server communication—by 31.5%–39.1% in a real-world testbed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".