MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408791866 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3554167

BlockHybrid: Accelerating Object Detection Pipelines With Hybrid Block-Wise Execution

2025· article· en· W4408791866 on OpenAlexaff
Renjie Xu, Keivan Nalaie, Rong Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsComputer sciencePipeline transportBlock (permutation group theory)Object (grammar)Parallel computingArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Latency-sensitive edge video analytics applications require rapid responses for real-time decision-making, driving the demand for efficient object detection pipelines. Conventional pipelines transmit and process full frames, overlooking redundancy in videos and leading to unnecessary resource consumption. Existing block-wise conditional execution methods mitigate this issue by processing only informative blocks. However, they treat all informative blocks equally and fail to further categorize these blocks. To address this limitation, we propose BlockHybrid, an edge video analytics framework designed to accelerate object detection pipelines by hybrid block-wise execution. Specifically, BlockHybrid classifies blocks into hard or easy blocks using a policy network. Hard blocks are transmitted and processed by a block-wise detector on the server, while easy blocks are handled by an efficient tracker locally on the camera, reducing redundant computation and communication. Extensive experiments demonstrate that BlockHybrid can achieve 8.8%–31.5% higher local execution speed and comparable detection accuracy compared to state-of-the-art methods, and accelerate end-to-end processing—including camera-to-server communication—by 31.5%–39.1% in a real-world testbed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.684
Threshold uncertainty score0.613

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207