Physically Guided High-Resolution Acoustic Impedance Inversion Based on Hybrid Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Seismic acoustic impedance (AI) inversion is essential for reservoir prediction and characterization. In recent years, deep learning has shown immense potential as a data-driven approach in seismic data processing, inversion, and interpretation. As a data-driven method, deep learning-based seismic inversion results better when sufficient labeled data are provided. Overfitting and poor generalization often occur when labels are insufficient. Due to the lack of labeled data in seismic inversion problems, the difficulty of inversion increases, leading to unstable and poor generalization of prediction results. To partially address this issue, we propose a constrained seismic inversion strategy. Since seismic records are time series, we exploit the convolutional neural network (CNN) and bidirectional LSTM (Bi-LSTM) network structures that are more applicable to time series. We combine the physical model and the initial model as constraints to improve the network stability and generalization ability, and impose sparse constraints on the reflection coefficient to further improve the prediction accuracy. The network structure transformation improves the efficiency and stability of the training process. Through numerical experiments and real data tests, it is proved that the proposed method improves the vertical resolution and geological reliability, providing a more stable and efficient method for seismic inversion under conditions of limited labeled data. The overall performance improved by 2% through comparative analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".