MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Voltage Sag Investigation for Induction Motor Startup in Distribution Systems using Solid State Transformer

2025· article· en· W4408793859 on OpenAlexaff
Khaled Ghambirlou, Adel Ali Abosnina, Gerry Moschopoulos

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoltage sagInduction motorTransformerDistribution transformerVoltageElectrical engineeringSolid-stateComputer scienceEngineeringPower qualityEngineering physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dealing with voltage sags during motor startup is crucial because they can delay power restoration and lead to widespread failures for industrial loads and distribution systems. A novel approach is introduced to investigate voltage sag in distribution networks using solid-state transformers (SSTs) instead of traditional ones. The induction motor startup model is employed to simulate voltage sags, accurately representing the characteristics influenced by conventional industrial loads. The inherent capabilities of SSTs are leveraged to mitigate these voltage sag issues effectively. This study focuses on analyzing voltage sags caused by the activation of induction motors in power systems, with particular emphasis on SST technology, which actively regulates voltage during motor starting by controlling reactive power. The selected distribution system is implemented and tested using MATLAB/Simulink. The results will be compared with previous research on voltage sag during motor startup, demonstrating the improvements and effectiveness of using SSTs in managing power quality issues. This study emphasizes the potential of SSTs to improve the stability and reliability of power systems during the challenging conditions of motor startup.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.838
Threshold uncertainty score0.418

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207