Collaborative and Integrated Platform to Support Distributed Manufacturing System Using a Service-Oriented Approach Based On Cloud Computing Paradigm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Increasing interest in distributed manufacturing systems is a result of the dynamic nature of today's business environment and with that comes the popularity of their use. This has given rise in the interest in distributed manufacturing systems. The indirect consequence of this has led to much higher use of distributed manufacturing systems. A large number of production processes, dispersed across a multitude of locations geographically separate, must be controlled and integrated in order to achieve production agility, flexibility and efficiency of costs. In our most recent project, we developed an integrated, collaborative manufacturing platform, the centerpiece of which was LAYMOD. To address the issues posed by such systems, this research presents a collateral and integrated platform based on a service oriented approach that can operate within the cloud computing paradigm. These systems present problems which the study is conducted in order to solve. Utilising the features of cloud computing, it aims to serve as a platform in solving process coordination and hence improving efficiency and scalability of distant manufacturing processes and potential real time communications among various stake holders. Furthermore, statistical research on the rates of platform module adoption in different settings provides specifics of (a) use patterns of some platform modules and (b) what capabilities are provided by some platform modules. When extrapolated to a wider size, our work is applied towards the creation of collaborative and integrated platforms for a number of the various manufacturing processes which are currently in use.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".