MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408800741 · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.124.049512

Safety, Functional Disability, Healthcare Utilization, and Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Elderly Receiving Alteplase and Tenecteplase: A Secondary Analysis From the AcT Trial

2025· article· en· W4408800741 on OpenAlexaff
Nishita Singh, Fouzi Bala, Ayoola Ademola, Mohammed Almekhlafi, Shelagh B. Coutts, Yan Deschaintre, Houman Khosravani, Brian Buck, Ramana Appireddy, F. Moreau, Gord Gubitz, Aleksander Tkach, Luciana Catanese, Dar Dowlatshahi, George Medvedev, Jennifer Mandzia, Aleksandra Pikula, Jai Shankar, Alexandre Y. Poppe, Heather Williams, Thalia S. Field, Herbert Alejandro Manosalva Alzate, Muzaffar Siddiqui, Atif Zafar, Oje Imoukhoude, Gary Hunter, Michel Shamy, Andrew M. Demchuk, Richard H. Swartz, Michael D. Hill, Tolulope T. Sajobi, Bijoy K. Menon, Aravind Ganesh

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsRed Deer Regional HospitalLondon Health Sciences CentreUniversity of British ColumbiaMcMaster UniversityQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreWestern UniversityUniversity of TorontoUniversité de SherbrookeQueen's UniversityOttawa HospitalHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of Alberta HospitalSt. Michael's HospitalKelowna General HospitalSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity of ManitobaGrey Nuns Community HospitalUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversité de MontréalUniversity of CalgaryMedicine Hat Regional HospitalManitoba Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTenecteplaseModified Rankin ScaleStroke (engine)Intracerebral hemorrhageFibrinolytic agentPoisson regressionQuality of life (healthcare)Emergency medicineThrombolysisInternal medicineTissue plasminogen activatorMyocardial infarctionIschemic strokeSubarachnoid hemorrhagePopulationIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Older age has been associated with overall poorer outcomes in acute ischemic stroke. We compared (1) outcomes in various health-related domains among patients <80 years and ≥80 years presenting with acute ischemic stroke and (2) whether outcomes differ between intravenous TNK (tenecteplase) versus alteplase. METHODS: Data are from patients included in AcT (Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke), a pragmatic, registry-linked, phase 3 randomized controlled trial comparing TNK with alteplase. Outcomes included functional disability (per 90-day modified Rankin Scale), safety (24-hour symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, 90-day mortality rates), health care utilization (discharge destination, length of stay, thrombectomy rate), and quality of life measures (EQ-5D-5L [EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level Scale]). With an a priori plan, patients aged <80 years were compared with those ≥80 years at symptom onset. Mixed effects Poisson regression was used to assess (1) the association of age with outcomes and (2) if these associations were modified by thrombolytic administered (TNK versus alteplase), after adjusting for sex, and baseline stroke severity. RESULTS: Of the 1577 patients, 1034 (65.6%; 520: TNK and 514: alteplase) were <80 years and 543 (34.4%; 286: TNK and 257: alteplase) were ≥80 years of age. Baseline characteristics in the 2 groups were similar except for sex 40% female in <80 years group versus 62.8% female in ≥80 years. There was no difference in rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (3.5% versus 3.1%). Patients in the ≥80 years group had significantly lower rates of excellent functional outcome, return to baseline status, higher mortality, and lower quality-of-life outcomes as compared with the <80 years group. Length of hospital stay was similar between the 2 groups but, patients in the ≥80 years age group had significantly lower rates of endovascular treatment utilization. Type of thrombolytic agent (TNK versus alteplase) did not modify the association between age and primary clinical outcome ( P interaction =0.22). CONCLUSIONS: Similar to alteplase, increasing age was associated with poorer functional outcomes with TNK. Rates of angiographic and bleeding outcomes were similar between patients <80 and ≥80 years. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03889249.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.005
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207