MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408809348 · doi:10.1134/s1819714024700581

Ore-Bearing Quartz–Light-Colored Mica Metasomatic Rocks in the Regional Precambrian Unconformity Zones in the Eastern Aldan Shield

2025· article· en· W4408809348 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
V. Ye. Kirillov, V. A. Guryanov

Bibliographic record

VenueRussian Journal of Pacific Geology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecambrianGeologyUnconformityShieldMicaMetasomatismGeochemistryBanded iron formationQuartzBearing (navigation)PaleontologySedimentary rock

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This article summarizes research results obtained for Late Proterozoic (1.32–1.15 Ga) ore-bearing (U, Mo, V, Zn, and Ag) quartz–light-colored mica metasomatic rocks of the Uchur–Ulkan region in the eastern Aldan Shield. Large faults and zones with structural and stratigraphic unconformities govern the development of mineralization. The study of the mineral composition of metasomatic rocks resulted in identification of sericite, hydrosericite, and roscoelite metasomatic rocks with quartz. Wallrock metasomatic features were described in gneisses, marbles, and volcanosedimentary rocks, and metasomatic zoning was revealed in rocks of different types. The overprinted metamorphic processes could be related to Late Proterozoic rejuvenation processes and extraction of ore components from rocks of the Ulkan Complex (1.72–1.68 Ga) at the metamorphic basement of the Siberian Platform and its platform cover. It is concluded that structural settings, age, and a number of composition characteristics, uranium ore deposits in the eastern Aldan Shield are similar to the Canadian and Onega “unconformity-type” deposits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.800

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussian Journal of Pacific GeologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207