Genetic Analysis of a Spontaneous Mutation Disrupting Midline Localization in Drosophila Follicular Epithelium Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the Drosophila ovary, the developing germline is surrounded by an epithelium of somatic follicle cells. This epithelium displays dynamic patterning by transcription factors throughout oogenesis, and these transcription factors play a crucial role in specifying cell fates within the developing egg. Previous studies have identified Midline (Mid), a T-box transcription factor, as one such regulator. Mid is expressed in the posterior region of the follicular epithelium cells in response to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling early in oogenesis, and its expression remains restricted to these cells during later stages. Mid is detected in the nuclei of the cells, as predicted for a transcription factor, but it is first translated in the cytoplasm of the cell before localizing to the nucleus. Mid immunofluorescent staining in wild-type follicular epithelia has also been observed to be occasionally cytoplasmic. Together this suggests potential dynamic regulation of Mid subcellular distribution; however, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We have identified a recessive mutation, referred to as r12m, that is associated with defective nuclear localization of Mid. In clones of follicle cells that are homozygous for r12m, Mid levels are reduced and Mid appears mislocalized from the nucleus, presenting as a hazy cytoplasmic smear rather than being clearly located within nuclei. We are conducting exploratory genetic analysis using techniques such as complementation tests, genetic mapping, and candidate gene testing to map the r12m mutation and identify the affected gene, with the goal of advancing our understanding of Mid regulation and subcellular localization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".