MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408810025 · doi:10.26443/msurj.v1i2.323

Understanding Cognitive Impairment in Early Psychosis through Functional Brain Dysconnectivity: A Whole-Brain Voxel-wise Analysis Approach

2025· article· en· W4408810025 on OpenAlexaff
K Fang, Matthew Danyluik, Katie M. Lavigne

Bibliographic record

VenueMcGill Science Undergraduate Research Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsDouglas College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychosisVoxelNeurosciencePsychologyCognitionCognitive impairmentVoxel-based morphometryMedicinePsychiatryMagnetic resonance imagingWhite matter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Early psychosis (EP) is the early stage of onset of psychosis symptoms, characterized by a loss of touch with reality. Cognitive impairment is prominent and even precedes symptom onset in individuals with psychosis, which is commonly driven by alterations in functional brain connectivity. Previous work has focused on brain regions defined a priori and relied on the assumption of normal distributions, which can hinder result generalizability. This project aims to build upon previous findings in a data-driven way and share code following open science principles. We utilize the Human Connectome Project-Early Psychosis dataset of 183 participants, consisting of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) scans and phenotypic data from a variety of cognitive domains, such as attention, memory, and processing speed. Functional connectivity is calculated in a voxel-wise manner to derive voxel-whole brain connectivity patterns. Multivariate Distance Matrix Regression (MDMR), a non-parametric technique, is then applied to assess relationships between functional connectivity differences and cognitive scores. Statistics for hypothesis testing follow an asymptotic null distribution, and theoretical p-values can be calculated such that the results are more robust. Further, scripts detailing the data analysis will be shared on GitHub, linked to an Open Science Framework project to aid replicability. We expect to identify some well-known brain areas implicating specific impairments, which will be externally validated in a follow-up study. This may provide a more holistic view on brain-cognition relationships for early psychosis and guide future applications in related fields of research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Bibliometrics, Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.625
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.025
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.232
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMcGill Science Undergraduate Research JournalSame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207