MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408821831 · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2025.130536

CALF-SBM: A covariate-assisted latent factor stochastic block model

2025· article· en· W4408821831 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sydney Louit, Evan Clark, Alexander Gelbard, Niketna Vivek, Panpan Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institutes of HealthNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCovariateMathematicsStochastic block modelFactor (programming language)Block (permutation group theory)StatisticsLatent variableBlock modelFactor analysisApplied mathematicsEconometricsComputer scienceCombinatoricsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a novel network generative model extended from the standard stochastic block model by concurrently utilizing observed node-level information and accounting for network-enabled nodal heterogeneity. The proposed model is so called covariate-assisted latent factor stochastic block model (CALF-SBM). The inference for the proposed model is done in a fully Bayesian framework. The primary application of CALF-SBM in the present research is focused on community detection, where a model-selection-based approach is employed to estimate the number of communities which is practically assumed unknown. To assess the performance of CALF-SBM, an extensive simulation study is carried out, including comparisons with multiple classical and modern network clustering algorithms. Lastly, the paper presents two real data applications, respectively based on an extremely new network data demonstrating collaborative relationships of otolaryngologists in the United States and a traditional aviation network data containing information about direct flights between airports in the United States and Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.612
Threshold uncertainty score0.729

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysica A Statistical Mechanics and its ApplicationsSame topicBayesian Methods and Mixture ModelsFrench-language works237,207