MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408822021 · doi:10.1021/acsomega.4c11051

dia-PASEF Proteomics of Tumor and Stroma LMD Enriched from Archived HNSCC Samples

2025· article· en· W4408822021 on OpenAlexaff
Aswini Panigrahi, Allison L. Hunt, Diego M. Assis, Matthew Willetts, Bhaskar Kallakury, Bruce J. Davidson, Jaeil Ahn, Thomas P. Conrads, Radoslav Goldman

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Omega · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsBruker (Canada)
FundersNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsStromaProteomicsComputational biologyBiologyCancer researchImmunologyBiochemistryImmunohistochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We employed laser microdissection to selectively harvest histology-resolved tumors and stroma from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) tissues. Peptide digests from the LMD-enriched HNSCC tissue were analyzed by quantitative mass-spectrometry-based proteomics using a data independent analysis approach. In paired samples, excellent proteome coverage was achieved, having quantified 6668 proteins with a median quantitative coefficient of variation under 10%. Significant differences in relevant functional pathways between the tumor and the stroma regions were observed. Extracellular matrix (ECM) was identified as a major component enriched in the stroma, including many cancer-associated fibroblast signature proteins in this compartment. We demonstrate the potential for comparative deep proteome analysis from a very low starting input in a scalable format. Correlating such results with clinical features or disease progression will likely enable the identification of novel targets for disease classification and interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score0.514

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS OmegaSame topicCancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207