MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408823347 · doi:10.5194/oos2025-1317

20 years of an international collaborative research in marine geochemistry: the GEOTRACES program

2025· preprint· en· W4408823347 on OpenAlexaff
Robert F. Anderson, Catherine Jeandel, Hélène Planquette, Tim M. Conway, Karen L. Casciotti, Yun Nishioka, Alessandro Tagliabue, Ana Aguilar‐Islas, William M. Landing, Elena Masferrer-Dodas

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeotracesOceanographyGeochemistryGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the past 20 years, the GEOTRACES program (www.geotraces.org) has produced transformative insights into the cycling of trace elements and isotopes (TEIs) in the ocean. Be they bioactive elements essential for sea life (e.g., Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn…); contaminants (e.g., Pb, Hg); or tracers of processes like particle settling velocity (e.g. Th, Pa), source of matter (e.g. Nd, Pb isotopes) or deep vertical diffusion (e.g., Ra, Ac), TEI marine concentrations range from the nanomol to the attomole per litre, making their measurements particularly challenging. Thus, GEOTRACES encouraged international partnership while instilling a strong spirit of collaboration among scientists from more than 35 nations for more than two decades. Rigorous intercalibration efforts, standard definitions and capacity building are the cornerstone of the program to ensure that basin-scale analyses made by any researcher worldwide can be compared without doubt. The resulting high-quality data sets are synthesized and released every 4 years as intermediate data products (IDP), the fourth one being expected in 2025. Accessible to all, at no cost, these data sets resulted in the production of an online electronic atlas (www.egeotraces.org) including data from all ocean basins. GEOTRACES scientific missions and strategies are annually discussed within the « Scientific Steering Committee », the data quality assessed by the « Standard and Intercalibration Committee » while the data base building is managed by the « Data Management Committee ». The whole coordination and animation of these rich and diverse activities are ensured by the « International Project Office », hosted in Toulouse (France), which also largely contributes to the outreach and educational efforts of the program (www.geotraces.org/gted/).The talk will briefly describe this collaborative structure and illustrate its success with breakthroughs in the understanding of the oceanic cycling of key elements, such as the paradigm shift to a view of the marine Fe cycle where multiple sources contribute, including continental margins and hydrothermal plumes, so far strongly underestimated. The contribution of radionuclides, natural chronometers of processes, will also be underlined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.042
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0420.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0030.022
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena→French-language works237,207→