MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408824233 · doi:10.5194/oos2025-852

Transforming relationships with the ocean through science at Canada’s  Bamfield Marine Sciences Centre – towards a new frontier for ocean science

2025· preprint· en· W4408824233 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicResearch Data Management Practices
Canadian institutionsBamfield Marine Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrontierOcean scienceOceanographyMarine researchGeographyRegional scienceGeologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Pacific Marine Science Alliance (PMSA) is a unique marine sciences partnership across five western Canadian universities (University of British Columbia, University of Alberta, University of Calgary, Simon Fraser University and University of Victoria) with a permanent base for marine and coastal-oriented field operations at the Bamfield Marine Sciences Centre (BMSC). Perched on the outer west coast of Canada, the BMSC is the epitome of realizing Dohrn’s vision to (1) provide unparalleled ocean access to remarkable biodiversity, (2) contribute to regional and global networks and collaborations, and (3) support the infrastructure and operations of modern marine stations. With support from the Canada Foundation of Innovation, the PMSA recently launched EMPOWER, a new research and training program to measure ocean weather and predict ecological response in near shore environments, in addition to a new marine science curriculum. In this talk I will highlight research opportunities for collaboration, and the role of PMSA for building and supporting Dohrn’s vision for ocean science globally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.928
Threshold uncertainty score0.520

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.008
Science and technology studies0.0170.012
Scholarly communication0.0210.012
Open science0.0020.009
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicResearch Data Management PracticesFrench-language works237,207