MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408826246 · doi:10.1002/advs.202409608

The Awakening Brain is Characterized by a Widespread and Spatiotemporally Heterogeneous Increase in High Frequencies

2025· article· en· W4408826246 on OpenAlexafffund
Tamir Avigdor, Guoping Ren, Chifaou Abdallah, F. Dubeau, Christophe Grova, Birgit Frauscher

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalMcGill University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsNeuroscienceDorsumElectroencephalographyPolysomnographyRipplePsychologyNeurophysiologyAudiologyMedicineAnatomyPower (physics)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Morning awakening is part of everyday life. Surprisingly, information remains scarce on its underlying neurophysiological correlates. Here simultaneous polysomnography and stereo-electroencephalography recordings from 18 patients are used to assess the spectral and connectivity content of the process of awakening at a local level 15 min before and after the awakening. Awakenings from non-rapid eye movement sleep are accompanied by a widespread increase in ripple (>80 Hz) power in the fronto-temporal and parieto-insular regions, with connectivity showing an almost exclusive increase in the ripple band in the somatomotor, default, dorsal attention, and frontoparietal networks. Awakenings from rapid eye movement sleep are characterized by a widespread and almost exclusive increase in the ripple band in all available brain lobes, and connectivity increases mainly in the low ripple band in the limbic system as well as the default, dorsal attention, somatomotor, and frontoparietal networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced ScienceSame topicSleep and Wakefulness ResearchFrench-language works237,207