The mediating role of mood dysphoria in the relationship between early maladaptive schemas and self-harming behaviors in adolescents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Clinical therapists and counselors believe that schemas and attitudes towards emotions are effective in reducing the experience of stress and ultimately preventing and improving the problems of self-harm in adolescents; therefore the aim of this study was to determine the mediating role of mood dysphoria in the relationship between necessary maladaptive designs and self-harming behaviors in adolescents. Research Method: The present study was descriptive-correlational. The statistical population of the study consisted of all high school boys in Lodab region, who were studying in the academic year 1399-1398., by cluster sampling in the first stage. Toronto (1986) Mood Dysfunction Questionnaires, Young's maladaptive schemes (YSQ), and Sanson et al. (SHI) were used to collect data. After collecting and extracting the data, the representative companies were analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficient, multiple regression analysis and path analysis. Results: Findings of direct research pathways showed that between self-harming behavior with emotional deprivation schemes, abandonment / instability, mistrust / abuse, social isolation / alienation, disability / shame, failure, dependence / inadequacy, sanctions against harm And there is significant illness, illness / underdevelopment, obedience, self-sacrifice, emotional inhibition, stubborn standards, merit / greatness, and self-control / self-discipline. There is also a positive correlation between self-injurious behavior with mood dysphoria and difficulty subscales in recognizing emotions, difficulty in describing emotions, and thinking with external orientation. Conclusion: The results of indirect relationship also showed that mood dysphoria plays a significant mediating role in the relationship between early maladaptive designs and self-harming behaviors in adolescents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".