MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Character of age distribution of precambrian detrital zircons in the section of the Yuryuzan-Sylvenskaya basin of the Uralian Foredeep based on U–Pb LA– ICP–MS isotopic dating — single source demolition indicator

2024· article· en· W4408829566 on OpenAlexaff
E. A. Volodina, A. V. Tevelev, A. A. BORISENKO, Egor Koptev

Bibliographic record

VenueMoscow University Bulletin Series 4 Geology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecambrianGeologySection (typography)Character (mathematics)GeochemistryStructural basinPaleontologyGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Yuryuzano-Sylvenskaya depression is part of the Uralian foredeep. It is filled with flysch-molasse complexes in the interval from the Moscovian stage of the Middle Carboniferous to the Artinskian stage of the Lower Permian. Nine samples were taken from different levels of the section to isolate and date detrital zircons. Of particular interest is the distribution of Precambrian ages in these zircons. From bottom to top, the amount of Precambrian zircons generally decreases from 97% to 4%. At the same time, the age distribution spectra of these zircons coincide throughout the section, which suggests a single source for them. In addition, these spectra are practically indistinguishable from the spectrum of zircons of the Asha series of the Vendian Bashkir megazone, which, apparently, is the source of Precambrian zircons of the Upper Paleozoic suites of the Yuryuzan-Sylvenskaya depression. It was a permanent element of the provenance area for the Upper Paleozoic suites of the Yuryuzano-Sylvenskaya depression. The Riphean rift complexes of the Bashkir megazone and the Archean-Early Proterozoic complexes of the Taratash ledge were not included in the provenance area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.962

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.158
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMoscow University Bulletin Series 4 GeologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207