Phased Methodology for the Optimal Rehabilitation of a Network with an Intermittent Water Supply Based on Hydraulic Criteria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The intermittent supply of drinking water represents a major technical and social challenge, affecting more than 1 billion people worldwide. This paper proposes a methodology with three stages to rehabilitate a deteriorated system with intermittent service in a time horizon of five years as part of the Battle of Intermittent Water Supply problem. First, the initial assessment stage identifies vulnerable areas and critical supply hours. The network is analyzed to establish whether it is possible to deliver the desired demand in a scenario without any leaks. The latter is to set a baseline scenario for the upcoming stages. The sectorization stage defines the optimal district metered areas to reduce water losses and increase supplied water through the improved control of flows and pressure. This stage is divided into clustering, by means of the Girvan–Newman algorithm, and partitioning by defining the location of valves. Finally, the third stage determines the optimum investments for asset rehabilitation. The optimization process is performed individually and sequentially for valve settings, pump replacements, storage tanks upgrade, pipe rehabilitation, leakage repair, frequency inverter installation and pumping operation modification, and simple controls. The final solution validates how hydraulic criteria, in combination with optimization techniques and engineering judgment, can significantly improve the operation of an intermittent water distribution system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".