MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408840388 · doi:10.36253/fh-3061

Material Culture

2024· article· en· W4408840388 on OpenAlexaff
Joanne Benham Rennick

Bibliographic record

VenueFashion Highlight · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines the Boott Cotton Mill in Lowell, Massachusetts, tracing its evolution from a major textile manufacturing hub in the 19th century to its current status as a Museum and educational centre within the Lowell National Historic Park. Initially a pivotal player in the global cotton industry, the mill was integral to New England’s economic growth, contributing significantly to American industrialization. However, globalization and technological changes led to its economic decline and eventual closure, reflecting broader deindustrialization trends. Its subsequent transformation into a National Historic Park represents a shift from industrial production to cultural preservation and urban restoration. The park now offers exhibits, guided tours, and educational programs that highlight the history of textile manufacturing, and the various ways in which the efforts to produce fabric also wove the culture and shaped the identity of a community. This preliminary study situates the mill, its labourers and its products both historically and today in the form of a National Historic Park, as a shaper and perpetuator of fashion, culture, education and community while pointing to opportunities for further research to understand the relationship between fibre production and culture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.006
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFashion HighlightSame topicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207