Cultural safety and First Nations health content within tertiary education for undergraduate health‐care students: A scoping review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Many health professional university programs have integrated content on First Nations health into their curricula in response to the serious health inequities between First Nations and non-First Nations peoples. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted, aiming to provide a deeper understanding of the various ways that tertiary education institutions are incorporating content on First Nations health and cultural safety into health professional education curricula, and how learning outcomes related to cultural capability are assessed. Online databases were used to identify papers published globally between 1995 and 2021, from which 28 were selected. CONSUMER AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: First Nations co-authors, working alongside occupational therapy academics, have ensured that the meaning and context of the relevant studies have been thoroughly understood and that appropriate terminology has been used throughout the review. FINDINGS: There is considerable variability in the way that content on First Nations health is delivered and assessed within the tertiary sector for health-care students, internationally. There are limited assessment tools that provide a comprehensive understanding of the ability to work in a culturally safe manner with First Nations peoples. CONCLUSION: The importance of having an understanding of First Nations peoples and health is recognised, with many institutions now, including this information into the university curricula as one method to positively impact the health outcomes of First Nations peoples, as well as in response to health professional accreditation and registration requirements. There remains variability with regard to how this content is delivered and assessed. Despite encouraging data on learning outcomes, it remains unclear whether this intervention has an impact on the health-care practices of graduates once they enter the workforce. Further research into the impact of this strategy is warranted in order to determine its effectiveness. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Many university programs for health professionals are recognising the importance of, including information about First Nations people in their courses, in an attempt to improve understanding and delivery of services to this population and address health inequities. This scoping review investigated how universities teach health-care students about First Nations health and cultural safety. It also explored how students' knowledge in this area was assessed. A total of 28 papers were selected and analysed within this review. The review found that there is great of variation in how universities teach and evaluate knowledge of this subject area. Some use a mix of online and face-to-face classes; it may be taught as a one off class or integrated throughout the entire curriculum. Activities like cultural immersion are also used. While many studies showed that students' knowledge and attitudes improved after learning about First Nations health, it is unclear if this education affects how the students practice as health-care professionals once they graduate, and if this has any impact on the health care and outcomes for First Nations people. Further research in this area is needed, focussing on how various teaching methods affect student learning, and how to accurately measure cultural safety. It should also consider the impact of culturally safe care on First Nations people's health and wellbeing. This review has some limitations. It only reviewed studies published in English and did not fully explore Indigenous teaching methods, nor did it consider the impact this innovation has on future practice as a health-care professional.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".