Binding Zinc and Oxo-Vanadium Insulin-Mimetic Complexes to Phosphatase Enzymes: Structure, Electronics and Implications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We explore the structural and electronic properties of representative insulin-mimetic oxovanadium and zinc complexes as computed in vacuum, in water clusters and upon binding to PTEN and PTP1B phosphatases. Albeit diverse, the enzymes' active sites represent evolutionary variant choices of the same type of biochemistry. Though different in respect to covalency and the orbital nature of bonding, theory predicts comparable ionic radii, bond lengths and square pyramidal coordination for the considered vanadyl and zinc systems when in an aqueous environment. Employing docking, DFT and quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics methods, we address possible polar interactions in the protein environments and compute infrared/Raman modes and optical electronic properties, which may be suitable for the structural analysis of the specific chemical moieties in binding studies. Accounting for how protein embedding may alter the electronic states of metal centres, we discuss artificial intelligence-assisted protein field engineering to assist biomedical and quantum information applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".