Multimodal SARS-CoV-2 interactome sketches the virus-host spatial organization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An accurate spatial representation of protein-protein interaction networks is needed to achieve a realistic and biologically relevant representation of interactomes. Here, we leveraged the spatial information included in Proximity-Dependent Biotin Identification (BioID) interactomes of SARS-CoV-2 proteins to calculate weighted distances and model the organization of the SARS-CoV-2-human interactome in three dimensions (3D) within a cell-like volume. Cell regions with viral occupancy were highlighted, along with the coordination of viral proteins exploiting the cellular machinery. Profiling physical intra-virus and virus-host contacts enabled us to demonstrate both the accuracy and the predictive value of our 3D map for direct interactions, meaning that proteins in closer proximity tend to interact physically. Several functionally important virus-host complexes were detected, and robust structural models were obtained, opening the way to structure-directed drug discovery screens. This PPI discovery pipeline approach brings us closer to a realistic spatial representation of interactomes, which, when applied to viruses or other pathogens, can provide significant information for infection. Thus, it represents a promising tool for coping with emerging infectious diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".