MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408855220 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0320452

Beyond the Greater Angkor Region: Automatic large-scale mapping of Angkorian-period reservoirs in satellite imagery using deep learning

2025· article· en· W4408855220 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArchaeological Research and Protection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsSatellite imageryHuman settlementArchaeologyScale (ratio)Remote sensingPeriod (music)Vegetation (pathology)Deep learningAerial photographyPhysical geographyGeographyCartographyComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Archaeologists often use high-resolution satellite imagery to identify potential archaeological sites or features, including ancient settlements, burial mounds, roads, and even subtle differences in vegetation or topography. Over the last several decades, satellite imagery and other remote sensing techniques (including aerial photography and LiDAR data) have been used to thoroughly map the extensive settlement complex of the Greater Angkor Region (1 500 km2, 9th - 14th centuries CE) in present-day Cambodia. While we now have a comprehensive map of this area, the landscapes beyond the Greater Angkor Region that formed the Angkorian cultural sphere have not been mapped, even though the density of features on the landscape seems to continue beyond the area considered Greater Angkor. While a comprehensive settlement study of the entire Angkorian realm would be incredibly helpful in understanding patterns of ancient urbanism and early statehood in Southeast Asia, mapping this area using manual identification of archaeological features in satellite imagery would be highly time-consuming. In this paper, we employ a state-of-the-art deep learning model for semantic segmentation using Deeplab V3 + to identify one typical and characteristic feature: Angkor-period reservoirs. Our results indicate that this AI model is accurate enough to provide a valuable "second opinion" to landscape archaeologists to enhance and quicken their mapping process, making them substantially more productive. The deep learning model for semantic segmentation employed here, which can be trained on other types of archaeological and non-archaeological features worldwide, will be a valuable tool for areas of research that involve intensive manual investigation and interpretation of satellite imagery and will aid researchers as they continue to map the Angkorian world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.172
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it