Beyond the Greater Angkor Region: Automatic large-scale mapping of Angkorian-period reservoirs in satellite imagery using deep learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Archaeologists often use high-resolution satellite imagery to identify potential archaeological sites or features, including ancient settlements, burial mounds, roads, and even subtle differences in vegetation or topography. Over the last several decades, satellite imagery and other remote sensing techniques (including aerial photography and LiDAR data) have been used to thoroughly map the extensive settlement complex of the Greater Angkor Region (1 500 km2, 9th - 14th centuries CE) in present-day Cambodia. While we now have a comprehensive map of this area, the landscapes beyond the Greater Angkor Region that formed the Angkorian cultural sphere have not been mapped, even though the density of features on the landscape seems to continue beyond the area considered Greater Angkor. While a comprehensive settlement study of the entire Angkorian realm would be incredibly helpful in understanding patterns of ancient urbanism and early statehood in Southeast Asia, mapping this area using manual identification of archaeological features in satellite imagery would be highly time-consuming. In this paper, we employ a state-of-the-art deep learning model for semantic segmentation using Deeplab V3 + to identify one typical and characteristic feature: Angkor-period reservoirs. Our results indicate that this AI model is accurate enough to provide a valuable "second opinion" to landscape archaeologists to enhance and quicken their mapping process, making them substantially more productive. The deep learning model for semantic segmentation employed here, which can be trained on other types of archaeological and non-archaeological features worldwide, will be a valuable tool for areas of research that involve intensive manual investigation and interpretation of satellite imagery and will aid researchers as they continue to map the Angkorian world.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".