MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408855811 · doi:10.1177/27536386251323018

Social responsiveness in paramedic academic programs: A conceptual framework

2025· article· en· W4408855811 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueParamedicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConceptual frameworkPsychologySociologyProcess managementComputer scienceBusinessSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Paramedic education programs play a critical role in preparing future paramedics to deliver high-quality care to diverse patient populations. However, the integration of social responsiveness, a key principle identified in the Paramedic Chiefs of Canada (PCC) report, Principles and Enabling Factors Guiding Paramedicine in Canada , remains inconsistent within paramedic academic programs. Social responsiveness emphasizes the profession's responsibility to address health disparities and promote social accountability, aligning with broader healthcare trends, including the CanMEDS 2025 framework and the World Health Organization's (WHO) global strategy for medical education. Despite its recognition in competency frameworks such as the Paramedic Association of Canada's (PAC) National Competency Framework for Paramedics (NCFP) and the Canadian Organization of Paramedic Regulators' (COPR) Canadian Paramedic Competency Framework (CPCF), a standardized approach to embedding social responsiveness in paramedic education has yet to be established. This manuscript proposes a conceptual framework for integrating social responsiveness into paramedic education, drawing on best practices from allied medical fields. Informed by a systemic literature review and analysis this framework identifies key structural reforms in recruitment, curriculum development, faculty training, continuous quality improvement, and institutional policies. A structural social responsiveness approach embeds equity and justice into the design, delivery, evaluation, and support systems of paramedic education, creating a learning environment that not only teaches social responsiveness but also embodies it in practice. By embedding social responsiveness into the foundational structures of paramedic education, this framework aims to institutionalize social accountability within academic programs, ensuring that paramedic graduates are not only clinically proficient but also equipped to champion health equity and social justice. This paper underscores the need for a transformative approach to paramedic education, positioning the profession alongside other healthcare disciplines in addressing systemic health disparities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.255
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.515
Teacher spread0.411 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it