MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408857868 · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092260

Mobile Health Biometrics to Enhance Exercise and Physical Activity Adherence in Type 2 Diabetes (MOTIVATE-T2D): a decentralised feasibility randomised controlled trial delivered across the UK and Canada

2025· article· en· W4408857868 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Katie Hesketh, Löw J, Robert Andrews, Sandra Blitz, Benjamin J. R. Buckley, Kaja Falkenhain, Jennifer Job, Charlotte Jones, Helen Jones, Mary E. Jung, Jonathan P. Little, Céu Mateus, Sarah Percival, Richard Pulsford, Catherine L. Russon, Joel Singer, Victoria S. Sprung, Alison M. McManus, Matthew Cocks

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMobile Health and mHealth Applications
Canadian institutionsCentre for Advancing Health OutcomesUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersMedical Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsMedicineRandomized controlled trialmHealthPhysical therapyType 2 diabetesPsychological interventionClinical trialIntervention (counseling)Family medicineDiabetes mellitusNursingInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Assess the feasibility of a mobile health (mHealth)-supported home-delivered physical activity (PA) intervention (MOTIVATE-T2D) in people with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2D). DESIGN: Feasibility multicentre, parallel group, randomised controlled trial (RCT). SETTING: Participants were recruited from England and Canada using a decentralised design. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (40-75 years) recently diagnosed with T2D (5-24 months). INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomised 1:1 to intervention (MOTIVATE-T2D) or active control groups. Participants codesigned 6month- home-delivered, personalised, progressive PA programmes supported by virtual behavioural counselling. MOTIVATE-T2D used biofeedback from wearable technologies to support the programme. The active control group received the same intervention without wearables. OUTCOMES: The primary outcomes were recruitment rate, retention and adherence to purposeful exercise. Clinical data on effectiveness were collected as exploratory outcomes at baseline, 6 and 12 months, with HbA1c and systolic blood pressure (BP) proposed as primary outcomes for a future full RCT. RESULTS: n=135 eligible participants expressed an interest in the trial, resulting in 125 participants randomised (age 55±9 years, 48% female, 81% white), a recruitment rate of 93%. Retention at 12 months was 82%. MOTIVATE-T2D participants were more likely to start (OR 10.4, CI 3.4 to 32.1) and maintain purposeful exercise at 6 (OR 7.1, CI 3.2 to 15.7) and 12 months (OR 2.9, CI 1.2 to 7.4). Exploratory clinical outcomes showed a potential effect in favour of MOTIVATE-T2D, including proposed primary outcomes HbA1c and systolic BP (between-group mean differences: HbA1c: 6 months: -5% change from baseline, CI -10 to 2: 12 months: -2% change from baseline, CI -8 to -4; systolic BP: 6 months: -1 mm Hg, CI -5 to 3: 12 months: -4 mm Hg, CI -8 to 1). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the feasibility of delivering the MOTIVATE-T2D mHealth-supported PA intervention for people with recently diagnosed T2D and progression to a full RCT to examine its clinical and cost-effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN: 14335124; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT0465353.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.243
Threshold uncertainty score0.482

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.497
Teacher spread0.429 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Open→Same topicMobile Health and mHealth Applications→French-language works237,207→