MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408858231 · doi:10.1109/tste.2025.3555194

Dual-Loop Geometric Control of Stator Flux for Improved LVRT Response in DFIG-Based Wind Turbine Systems

2025· article· en· W4408858231 on OpenAlexaff
Jacqueline Dubreuil, Ignacio Galiano Zurbriggen, J.K. Pieper

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPower Systems and Renewable Energy
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatorDoubly fed electric machineControl theory (sociology)TurbineWind powerLoop (graph theory)Induction generatorControl systemAC powerEngineeringComputer scienceControl (management)Electrical engineeringAerospace engineeringVoltageMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Doubly Fed Induction Generator (DFIG) based wind turbinesare particularly sensitive to grid disturbances, which has implications for overall power system stability. Grid codes require continual operation of DFIGs despite certain system disturbances. During a three-phase voltage dip, the decay of a natural flux fixed to the stator of the machine induces large voltages in the rotor windings, leading to saturation of rotor converters and potential damage to the system. This work presents a novel dual-loop state-plane based architecture to solve the stator flux transient, allowing the system to regain standard operation and power reference tracking in a fast and effective manner. An outer loop geometric controller is proposed as a framework for achieving rapid and controllable transients in the decoupled state space, and various reference geometries are considered. The proposed control structure implements a unique continuous solution for both steady state and transient operating conditions and does not require any additional hardware, switching circuits, or fault detection mechanisms. Performance-based tuning is used to determine a controller that optimizes the performance index across a variety of grid fault levels, and the resultant controller is shown to achieve rapid transient response for all fault levels, with power reference tracking achieved in under one line cycle (<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\text{20}\,\text{ms}$</tex-math></inline-formula>) for even the most extreme grid faults. The proposed controller is supported by detailed mathematical analysis and validated by simulation results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Sustainable EnergySame topicPower Systems and Renewable EnergyFrench-language works237,207