Unsupervised Test-Time Adaptation for Hepatic Steatosis Grading Using Ultrasound B-Mode Images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ultrasound (US) is considered a key modality for the clinical assessment of hepatic steatosis (i.e., fatty liver) due to its noninvasiveness and availability. Deep learning methods have attracted considerable interest in this field, as they are capable of learning patterns in a collection of images and achieve clinically comparable levels of accuracy in steatosis grading. However, variations in patient populations, acquisition protocols, equipment, and operator expertise across clinical sites can introduce domain shifts that reduce model performance when applied outside the original training setting. In response, unsupervised domain adaptation techniques are being investigated to address these shifts, allowing models to generalize more effectively across diverse clinical environments. In this work, we propose a test-time batch normalization (TTN) technique designed to handle domain shift, especially for changes in label distribution, by adapting selected features of batch normalization (BatchNorm) layers in a trained convolutional neural network model. This approach operates in an unsupervised manner, allowing robust adaptation to new distributions without access to label data. The method was evaluated on two abdominal US datasets collected at different institutions, assessing its capability in mitigating domain shift for hepatic steatosis classification. The proposed method reduced the mean absolute error in steatosis grading by 37% and improved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) for steatosis detection from 0.78 to 0.97, compared to nonadapted models. These findings demonstrate the potential of the proposed method to address domain shift in US-based hepatic steatosis diagnosis, minimizing risks associated with deploying trained models in various clinical settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".