A Software for Identification and Characterization of Theta Rhythms in the Hippocampus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Characterizing theta rhythms in the hippocampus provides a window into understanding memory processing. An inquiry that arises when an animal sustains a pathological state is how theta rhythms are affected. In pathological states like epilepsy or Alzheimer’s, these rhythms change in specific ways. Statistically robust changes in these rhythms could serve as potential biomarkers, indicating the severity of the animal’s condition and the effectiveness of a drug. However, this understanding depends on how the data is analyzed. There are currently no standard criteria for recognizing theta dominance in experimental recordings. To address this, we have developed novel MATLAB-based software with an easy-to-use graphical user interface which enables identifying and analyzing theta rhythms in a standard way. We discuss the software’s functionality and its underlying algorithms. The algorithms were developed using previously acquired EEG/LFP data recorded from the hippocampus of a mouse kindling model of epilepsy. Two primary analyses were conducted to test the software’s functionality: first, comparing theta rhythms during the baseline period versus during spontaneous recurrent seizures; second, analyzing the timing of theta rhythms relative to the seizure event. Our illustrative results indicate that our developed software can robustly identify theta events with statistically significant feature differences. Further, the examination presented here with two mice shows that while theta events can occur just before seizures, it takes tens of minutes post-seizure before theta rhythms occur again. Our software thus provides the user with the ability to robustly identify and characterize theta rhythms and their feature changes. Significance Statement Theta rhythms in the hippocampus are fundamental for spatial navigation and memory formation. Their observed changes during several pathological states such as epilepsy and Alzheimer’s make them highly interesting to be able to serve as biomarkers. However, their variability (in terms of the time of occurrence, duration, and frequency range) makes them challenging to quantify. The absence of available tools for the automatic extraction of these rhythms from extended datasets significantly hampers processing efficiency and reduces accuracy and consistency. Clinicians and researchers often manually inspect their data to identify these rhythms, a process that is not only time-consuming but also inherently subjective. We have thus developed a MATLAB software for precise, automatic analysis of theta rhythms in EEG/LFP recordings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".